A few months ago I visited Islamabad and Kabul. My hotel in Pakistan survived a suicide bomb attack in which two people were killed. The next day in Peshawar the local chief of police and about a dozen others were killed while walking in a funeral parade.
Listening to the speakers at a conference on Baluchistan, I began to learn more of Pakistan's internal dynamic. A federation in name, the country is a military dictatorship dominated by an elite drawn largely from the Punjab. The poorer, more rural, more tribal provinces feel left out, on the fringe of both economic development and political participation.
It seems to be an assumption of U.S. and Canadian policy that General Musharaf, the Chief of the military who is also the President, is our best bulwark against terrorism and the extremism that straddles the border between Pakistan and Afghanistan.
Yet there is a contradiction. Our troops are fighting for democracy and pluralism in Afghanistan. Shouldn't our policy be the same in Pakistan? Thousands have been killed and are missing in Baluchistan and Northwest Province - in the complex politics of the country thousands of political prisoners are in jail because they're opposed to a dictatorship.
General Musharaf's attack on the Chief Justice is a reminder of what authoritarian regimes are like: he doesn't like dissent or criticism, and the west runs the risk of encouraging an even more unstable outcome by lining up willy nillly to support him
We need a regional political and diplomatic strategy for Pakistan and Afghanistan, and need to encourage NATO to embrace an approach that is less exclusively military. We can't wait until 2009 for such a strategy to unfold. We need to be embracing it now.
Valid points and arguments
You raise a number of good points. For me, the situation Pakistan vs. the US has been extremely "weird".
On the one hand, Bush proclaims to wage war so that he can spread democracy, but on the other hand, he cooperates with a guy who grabbed power through a coup and has been acting in a way that doesn't really lend itself to being described as "democratic".
Totally unrelated, I'd like to wish you a speedy recovery after your surgery and wish you good luck in your future political endeavours. I am not a Liberal (not anymore), but I have a lot of respect for you, Mr. Rae -- for what it's worth, in my opinion, you transcend party lines, and one doesn't have to be a Liberal or a Dipper or whatever to respect and/or even like what you do.
I don't wish to open old wounds, but if you had become party leader, I might, perhaps, still support the Liberal Party.
www.wernerpatels.com